Free · independent · England & Wales

See what a home really costs — to run, and to fix.

Look up any address to see what it costs to run, what it would take to improve, and the decisions that matter before you buy, own or let it.

Built from official EPC and Land Registry data. The check is free; detailed action plans are available when you need one.

The national finding

48.9%

of rated homes sit below EPC band C — the retrofit gap between today's housing stock and the band C standard.

We matched 44.1% of retained dwellings to recent Land Registry sales: below-C rated stock has an estimated matched-sale exposure of £1.7tn. Methodology

18,149,673 rated dwellings, de-duplicated to the latest certificate · EPC register + HM Land Registry · last updated 2026-Q2.

01
The national picture

The scale of the problem — and whether it is shifting

A national view of the homes still below band C, the modelled cost of closing the gap, and the direction of travel.

Homes below band C

8,875,483

dwellings rated D–G across England & Wales.

Modelled cost to reach band C

£75.9bn(modelled estimate of the cost to reach band C)

The deadline

2030

Rented homes are set to need EPC band C by 2030 (MEES).

Fig.1The retrofit gap over time

Stock · year-end
National retrofit gap by year

Share of all rated dwellings below band C at each year-end — the headline metric over time, ending at today's 48.9%. Tracks every home by its latest certificate; the decline reflects both reassessments and the growing rated stock. EPC register.

02
The fusion — analysis others don't do

Where below-C housing value is concentrated

Most EPC trackers stop at the energy rating. We match HM Land Registry sales to EPC certificates to estimate matched-sale exposure, price per m², the observed C-or-above price/m² spread, and transaction-rate signals. These are modelled estimates shown with coverage, not valuations. Methodology

44.1% coverageMatched-sale estimate from recent HM Land Registry sales. Not a valuation. Methodology.

Matched sale £/m²

£3,295/m²

Matched-sale exposure

£1.7tnmatched-sale estimate of below-C rated stock value; not a valuation

C+ sale-price premium — size/type/location controlled

+7.1%
Homes rated C or better sell for ~+7.1% more per m², holding size, type and location constant (95% CI +7.1%+7.1%).

Below-C transaction rate

1.08×
03
League tables

Where the gap is widest — and where it's closing

Areas ranked by their retrofit gap. Rank 1 is the widest gap.

Explore all 318 authorities on the interactive map →

Widest gap — local authorities

Worst local authorities by retrofit gap
#Local authorityRetrofit gap
1Isles of Scilly
83.3%
2Gwynedd
70.0%
3Castle Point
68.4%
4Ceredigion
67.9%
5Staffordshire Moorlands
67.5%
6Pendle
67.0%
7North Norfolk
64.4%
8Isle of Anglesey
64.3%
9Southend-on-Sea
64.2%
10Blackpool
63.8%

Narrowest gap — local authorities

Best local authorities by retrofit gap
#Local authorityRetrofit gap
309Vale of White Horse
37.0%
310Telford and Wrekin
36.2%
311Cambridge
36.0%
312Hackney
34.5%
313Southwark
33.8%
314Milton Keynes
32.1%
315City of London
31.7%
316Knowsley
31.3%
317Salford
30.3%
318Tower Hamlets
20.3%

Widest gap — constituencies

Narrowest gap — constituencies

Best constituencies by retrofit gap
#ConstituencyRetrofit gap
566Hackney South and Shoreditch
28.9%
567Knowsley
28.9%
568Greenwich and Woolwich
28.2%
569Stratford and Bow
28.2%
570West Ham and Beckton
27.8%
571Milton Keynes Central
25.1%
572Manchester Central
24.2%
573Bermondsey and Old Southwark
23.9%
574Salford
21.4%
575Poplar and Limehouse
14.2%
04
Ranked by money — analysis others don't do

Everyone ranks by the gap. We rank by exposure.

We match HM Land Registry sales to EPC certificates, so we can rank areas by below-C matched-sale exposure, the observed C-or-above price/m² spread, and how fast below-C homes are transacting. Modelled estimates; rate tables limit to areas with 20,000+ rated homes. Methodology

Matched-sale spread vs cost

Nationally, the observed C-or-above matched-sale spread is 1.59× the modelled per-dwelling cost-to-C. This is a market signal, not evidence that works caused the price difference.

Most matched-sale exposure — local authorities

Local authorities by below-C matched-sale exposure. Matched-sale estimates; areas below the coverage floor are omitted.
#Local authorityExposure
1Kensington and Chelsea
£27.6bn
2Buckinghamshire
£26.9bn
3Cornwall
£26.9bn
4North Yorkshire
£24.7bn
5Westminster
£21.9bn
6Somerset
£21.0bn
7Wandsworth
£18.6bn
8Wiltshire
£17.8bn
9Birmingham
£17.4bn
10Barnet
£17.1bn

Largest spread vs cost — local authorities

Local authorities by observed C-or-above price/m² spread divided by modelled upgrade cost. Not a causal payback claim.
#Local authoritySpread/cost
1Newham
16.60×
2Greenwich
13.12×
3Westminster
12.97×
4Hammersmith and Fulham
9.58×
5Tower Hamlets
9.35×
6Hartlepool
8.55×
7Rhondda Cynon Taf
8.03×
8Blackburn with Darwen
7.62×
9Middlesbrough
7.62×
10Salford
7.60×

Largest C+ sale-price premium — local authorities

Local authorities by C-or-above sale-price premium. Modelled (size/type/location controlled) where the area has a model, otherwise the observed matched-sale spread.
#Local authorityC+ premium
1Hartlepool
+46.1%
2Hyndburn
+38.1%
3Burnley
+36.7%
4Bolsover
+34.1%
5County Durham
+33.0%
6Neath Port Talbot
+30.8%
7Sunderland
+29.0%
8Rossendale
+29.0%
9Pendle
+28.7%
10Blackburn with Darwen
+28.6%

Fastest below-C transactions — local authorities

Local authorities by below-C transaction-rate ratio in matched sales.
#Local authorityRate ratio
1Derbyshire Dales
1.66×
2South Norfolk
1.64×
3Cotswold
1.62×
4West Oxfordshire
1.59×
5Wychavon
1.57×
6Cherwell
1.56×
7Stratford-on-Avon
1.53×
8Tewkesbury
1.52×
9Tower Hamlets
1.52×
10Forest of Dean
1.49×

From national evidence to your property

The averages stop here. Check the home you actually own.

Get the real EPC, likely running costs and route to band C for one address. Landlords can then rank a portfolio by 2030 exposure, modelled cost and the decision they are weighing: fix or sell.

The deadline has moved before. See where the rule stands now.

Live beta. Start with one property free; unlock the beta portfolio report for modelled cost-to-C, matched-sale value context, exemption prompts, and fix-or-sell priority. Figures are modelled estimates, not valuations or quotes.

Checking one home as an owner or buyer? Start here →

For the data desk — free to cite

Where homes are hardest to heat and to fix

The Cold Homes Index: a four-part cross of official data — off-gas-grid heating and fuel poverty (hard to heat) against solid-wall construction and deprivation (hard to fix). These English local authorities sit worst on the composite. A cross-reference for researchers and reporters — not a causal claim. Ranked by the 0–100 index.

Local authorities scoring highest on the Cold Homes Index
#Local authorityCold Homes Index
1Great Yarmouth
88 / 100
2Birmingham
85 / 100
3Leicester
84 / 100
4Nottingham
84 / 100
5Hastings
81 / 100
6East Lindsey
81 / 100
7Liverpool
80 / 100
8Enfield
80 / 100
9Manchester
80 / 100
10Wolverhampton
79 / 100

Off-gas-grid & solid-wall: EPC certificates. Fuel poverty: DESNZ sub-regional LILEE (England). Deprivation: English Indices of Deprivation 2019. England local authorities only; see the methodology. Explore the full Cold Homes Index →

What actually works

From the gap to the fix

The same EPC record that measures the gap also shows what moves a home up a band — and what it costs. These tools run on real register data.

Stay updated

A monthly note when the Index refreshes

A monthly email when the Home Index is refreshed.